We know this is old news (July '15), but it's so absurd as to warrant republication. Is it possible to be so politically correct that one is neither correct nor political?
We were going to suggest that the DB editor's post engendered contempt for the DB, but we fear "engender" may now be a proscribed verb, so we decided to suggest it would lead to contempt, but lead paint is banned in many states, and we did not want to confuse the homophonically challenged, but that distinction contains the two syllables "homo," and we did not want to offend those who don't know the difference between the Latin homo (man/male) and the Greek ομος (same as, diacriticals omitted), etc., etc.
So we concluded the editor should just grow a pair. Unless he/she they/them has/hasn't/needn't, or perhaps all of the above under special circumstances.
News Update
☰
Commentary
And the cry of wimp! was heard in the land
Recent Posts
- Fact-Check Feature Fortifies Future Ferreting
- Basketball's Bill Walton '74 Dead at 71
- Spring Sing Cancellation Dismays Performers, Alumni
- New feature: Readers' Reports
- So what else is nu?
- Walter Shatford, 30s Sports Editor
- Nobel Prize to Patapoutian
- Dave McNary, Beloved Longtime Variety Film Reporter, Dies at 69
- UC Demographics Suggest Diversity
- And the cry of wimp! was heard in the land
- UCLA, Cal State LA Quarantine Hundreds in Measles Case
- Washington Scoring Again
- Garrigues History Articles Removed
- LA Times' Former Westside Reporter Ken Reich Dies